jump to navigation

New SCC Blog February 11, 2009

Posted by Phillip Gibb in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

For those that do not know Ron from JustPlainRon and myself, SynapticLight have started up the Stellenberg Community Church Blog. Ok before May 2009 is out this blog will have been renamed to confirm to the new Church Name – yes you guessed it we are also changing or name. So be ready with you suggestions because we are going to need all the help you can offer, especially seeing the suggestions we have already received, ha ha ha – to see those freaky, nayyy ridiculous, suggestions be sure to be at Church 10 minutes early this Sunday; 10:20 15th Feb 2009, directions on the blog or the website.

back to the SCC blog – we are going to keep you updated with

  • All the Life Change that is happening around us – let me tell you that is is pretty awesome; in the form of video stories as people choose to be Baptized.
  • Sunday Reports of how the Sunday Services went with all the technical and message details
  • Up and coming series
  • General Stuf happening or about to happen
  • but more so – how God is working in Church and in the Lives of those that come to our Church

 

word out

Leveraging Video in the Church January 27, 2009

Posted by Phillip Gibb in Video.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Leveraging Video for Church

A wonderful and thrilling post I wrote. Please add your comments and thoughts, they will be greatly appreciated especially in light of the changes and move that we; as a Church, are going though.

Exciting times.

The Kick Drum (Part 2) January 16, 2009

Posted by Gareth in Audio.
Tags:
add a comment

Well according to this article I was meant to let you know about how to EQ a kick drum! Oh dear, I seem to have forgotten. But never fear it will be done now!

I’m going to be fairly brief in describing the type of EQ I generally use. There tends to be different sounds according to different styles of music. I’m particularly interested in the “pop-rock sound in a live setting” kind of kick. That is where most of this post will head so if you listen to a different style then take a few pointers and develop your style of kick.

Let’s start at the bottom. How low do you think the kick goes? Maybe not as low as you think. Assuming you have an average size kick that has been tuned to a normal kick drum pitch it most likely won’t have fundamental frequencies below 50Hz. My favourite area (low end wise) is actually 60Hz for that chest thump that you can only really feel. However, I do believe that there are situations where your bass and kick fight for the low-end sound and that can really sound ugly. If your bass guitarist tends to play a lot of low notes or just has a song where he plays that low B on the 5 string bass a lot. It’s best to let the bass guitar take the lead here and find another frequency for the kick (Its easier than finding another frequency for the bass guitar). Don’t boost the bass guitar here let it naturally come through as boosting will make the mix very muddy. Search for the frequency you need with the bass guitar playing with the kick (this is something I’ve just learnt to be honest, and it helps) usually from 60Hz – 125Hz. Anything higher than 125Hz just doesn’t have the power.

250Hz!!! This is a nice area to cut your kick slightly to again to let the kick dominate this area. I love the bass dominating this frequency range it sounds so full and “edgy”. It also helps define the bass guitar in the mix.

400Hz – 800Hz. If you have an EQ that can do it all. Then, I would also recommend you cut a little in this region as it can muddy the mix and give the kick a hollow dead sound. Not too important but something I notice and don’t like too much from my kick drum.

Ah!!! The “edge” or “click” how ever you refer to it. It is that beautiful sound of the beater hitting that skin and giving definition to the kick when you need it. It is a must and out of all the frequencies listed here this is the second (60Hz is the first) most important. Reading a few articles people reference this to be between 3kHz – 5kHz but I’ve found it lower than that on a few occasions (never lower than 1kHz though). Ideally it sounds the best (with our setup) at the ~4.5kHz region. This frequency is very dependant on where you place the kick drum microphone.

So there are some starters and I hope you find them delectable. as a side note we have a less than desirable desk with only one sweepable EQ and two static ones. so usually this is the general EQ. Sometimes I wish I could just change values digitally like Logic, Reason, Pro-tools,…………, Cubase,…………, Audacity,………[and so on]……

10kHz @ -1dB
4.5kHz @ + 5.5dB
80Hz @ +1.5dB

So what style of music do you like and how do you EQ your kick? I know the jazz listeners are going to hate my EQ ;)

Video Mixer Advice January 13, 2009

Posted by Phillip Gibb in Video.
Tags:
add a comment

Looking for some relevant advice on the other blog:  SynapticLight

no sense splitting the discussion so please add comments there :-)

we are heading into some interesting and exciting times as a Church and need relevant and good advice in all things tech :-)

The BIG Move January 6, 2009

Posted by Phillip Gibb in Video.
Tags:
add a comment

It is coming, a big step, a big move. Well ok; an intermediate step – the Real Big one will come when we move to a completely new permanent location.

Our Church is heading off to a new location, just down the road but a bigger and better location. Wow, it is about time – if I might say so myself (hope our Paster, our lead communicator does not read this, hehehe) all I can say is thank the Lord and mean it in every sense of the phrase!

There are going to be challenges, especially technical – ooohh yes, hard core challenges indeed. For me; on the video side, it is going to be exciting. In many ways I am hoping for a renaissance to occur in my team during 2009 and this could be the thing that will kick it off – in a big way.

It is going to be awesome, watch this space etc etc ;-)

And watch what God can do :-)

Church and Tech December 11, 2008

Posted by Phillip Gibb in Audio, Video.
Tags: , , ,
1 comment so far

We have all been there, well maybe not all, maybe just those old enough ;-) , where our Church had an overhead projector. It was great wasn’t? And sometimes the songs were hand written on a transparency, wow. Sound was probably in a more acceptable  state with decent microphones for that age of technology. Seems that Sound and Audio was always just a few steps ahead of Video and Graphics. Which was probably because video cameras and digital projectors were just not practical and affordable a few decades ago. And I still think Video is catching up – and fighting for it’s place in a Sound and Audio centered Church Technology. Not a grip, a small frustration. Sound is and all encompassing factor in all aspects of a Church Service including Video and umm a mime.

But is it really all necessary? All that money thrown at the latest, greatest and best piece of equipment all for the pursuit of excellence. Thousands of people have come to know Jesus without the use of fancy speakers, projectors, video cameras etc. Jesus spoke to the 3000 and the 5000  and he did not need anything special. Ok there was not anything tech wise in that day, silly point. But how do we justify spending $100,000′s for items like the DigiDesign ICON, Barco or Christie projectors, RED cameras and insane Video and Audio editing equipment. I can put it down to excellence, to creating a comfortable experience, ensuring the message is clear, and enticing people to come back for more. But at the end of the day God can use anything, any person and any situation to connect with someone on a personal level. That could be in the awesome Tech Church experience or at a rural Church in the middle of Africa.

I guess at the end of the day it is about who you are trying to reach, how many people you are reaching and the relevance of the message. And so long as people are being reached as can be evidenced by Baptisms and amazing life changing stories.

I for one am all for excellence and Video :-) , and I dream of the day when we have the Video Cameras and editing equipment that I believe is an extension of our worship and reverence of God and the message we bring to reach those that need to find Jesus. And until then and am happy that I get to be used by God with what I have at the moment. Not that I am content to be stuck at that level forever ;-)

The RED Revolution November 17, 2008

Posted by Phillip Gibb in Video.
Tags:
add a comment

it is a RED EPIC or SCARLET: 

 
RED One is a 4K (4900 x 2580)  High definition Digital Camera with 
4:4:4 colour ‘compression’ @ a maximum of 30 fps. Which in itself is 
mind blowing because the only thing better was IMAX. And when is come 
to projection of images at High Definition 4K is the best for good 
standard Digital Cinema with a 8K prototype out there and very few 
IMAX Cinemas. 

Then the Revolution – the RED Revolution!!!! 

Introducing the Digital Still and Motion Capture system (DSMC) with an 
unimaginable amount of configurations upon the Brains on the system : 
http://www.red.com/epic_scarlet/ 

with a maximum of 28K – that is 28000K x 9334. No that is not a typo 
that is a 2.5 times IMAX resolution. Now picture watching a screen 
twice the size as IMAX, HUUUUGE. 

Ok it is overkill. 

Buuuuut…. 

Everything is configurable, you could get a standard 3K configuration 
and the expand to a 9K option by just replacing one single component 
(ok there may be something else involve with the different sensor 
sizes). This opens the door to renting different sensors  when needed 
instead of the whole camera. 

The question I have is how on earth do you edit 28K???? There is no 
way to preview it, not even for 4K. That’s why most people work on so- 
called offline resolutions that comes with the native resolution in 
the RED camera, that is like 2K and 1K I believe. 

This is truly a revolution. 

I certainly want one, but the editing backbone to support the 
transformation of raw footage to viewable content is going to have to 
be brain flipping. Computers, hard drives and screen will have to be 
evolved to work with such resolutions in real time. The revolution 
must take place  in hardware and software. I am hoping to see the 
ripple effect within the year – it is going to be interesting.

Intersect: Getting Involved in and with the Community October 27, 2008

Posted by Phillip Gibb in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

From SynapticLight:

“A few weeks back I posted a short teaser for the Intersect Project that we at Stellenberg Community Church; together with North Point Community Church and Metro Kids Africa, will be be taking part in soon. It was posted in order to start a buzz about the whole endeavor. Well the time for buzz is over – so to speak – now is the time to commit and be a part of helping the community with the community.

Below is a longer version that shows more video footage of the area that Metro Kids works in as well as more photographs. Intersect begins in November and we’ll be getting people in to fix the facilities before hand and then we go in and paint etc, as well as connecting with all the kids and  treating the Metro Kids leaders to a great day of celebration for what they have been doing. It is going to awesome.

To me it is a fantastic opportunity to be involved in something so much bigger than myself. And the best part is that this will not be one of those get in get out – pat me on the back things; this is the start of an ongoing project in working with the community to assist were there is need.

One thing that is for sure is that I’ll be working to get as much footage as possible in order to put together  a really cool documentary that can be used even after all the physical location work has been done. Really looking forward to being involved and seeing the impact that this will have on the children’s’ Lives.

Later I’ll add a second video of some questions we asked three of the leaders during the filming of the promotion content.”

Sound – 20081019 October 21, 2008

Posted by Gareth in Audio.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

Ok, so the sound this last week was a bit lacking (first service only as I didn’t really hear the whole second service). So, I chatted to Glenn and Carlos and hopefully they corrected the mistakes in the second. I had a question about how to bring about clarity in the mix. Which comes down to how do you make each instrument distinguishable in the mix. This has many answers from a good sound system to a acoustically tuned room. We have a level that we have hit as far as clarity goes and, I assume as I wasn’t there in the second service, that this level was not met. So what do we usually do? How do we usually go about clearing up the mix. Well, with the equipment we have it comes down to EQ, leveling, and stereo’ing (won’t be writing about gates etc). Before I start I want to say that if you have any effects in the mix or on instruments (I’m mainly talking about reverbs) and your mix has no clarity you should look to turn these down or even off as these tend to be the biggest culprits in muddying the mix.

Most of what I’m going to write about has come from reading some excerpts from “The mixing engineers handbook” by Bobby Owsinski. It is a great resource, I don’t own it but would like to. You can preview it here or here and buy it on amazon here. So from the book it mentions “The Golden Rules of EQ”. Which are:

  • If it sounds muddy cut some 250Hz
  • If it sounds honky cut some 500Hz
  • Cut if you are trying to make things sound better
  • Boost if you are trying to make things sound different
  • You can’t boost something that’s not there in the first place

The rules are very generalized and in most of the cases I think some of these rules might need to be broken but generally this method does help. So lets get down to specifics.

First the POTs on the desk we have have these characteristics so for my sound guys reading you need to know this data (only wish we had two sweepable EQs). Added to the POTs is a 80Hz high pass filter which cuts everything below 80Hz (leave this out for kick as you will read below). The high frequency POT is a shelving EQ at 10kHz (If you don’t know what shelving or high pass mean go read this. The low frequency POT is a shelving EQ at 100Hz. The mid frequency POT is a peaking EQ variable between 250Hz and 5kHz. All these EQ’s have a decrease or increase of 15dB.

Kick – It was really good this last service but for consistences sake I will give a general EQ for the kick (No stereo for the kick unless you are trying to achieve a specific effect).

  • Bottom: 80-100Hz
  • Hollowness: 400Hz
  • Point: 3-5kHz

The bottom is where the power is at. We have a slight boost on the subwoofers’ EQ in this range so adding more on the kick’s low frequency can really kill (by that I mean it can move your chest). With the EQ’s that we have generally a mild 2dB boost on the low POT and 6-10dB boost at about 2-4kHz brings out a very nice kick sound. Adding some hollowness can add a little something to the kick but again I wish we had two sweepable EQ’s.

Snare – The snare was my most distracting point on Sunday. I believe Carlos and Glenn fixed it though. So lets get to fixing the problem using EQ (generally stereo’ing the snare isn’t done but can be used for and effect).

  • Fatness:120-240Hz (Reggae style music benefits from a bit of this but rock doesn’t so we usually cut the low
  • Boing: 900Hz
  • Crispness: 5kHz
  • Snap: 10kHz

So this is what I like. And generally snare can be a matter of taste but the snap and crispness to me are the focal point of what makes a snare, a snare. so the POTs I generally cut the low by 2-4dB add 6-10dB at 5kHz and leave the high frequency POT (The reason I leave it is, the house speaker’s emphasises the 8kHz a bit too much for my liking and boosting the high’s can really hurt your ears). Generally the kick and snare I bring/level slightly above the mix. I just like it that way.

Toms – The toms are difficult because each is tuned and designed differently but generally the frequencies are:

  • Fullness: 240-500Hz (Floor tom is 80-120Hz
  • Attack: 5-7kHz

You need to find the fundamental frequency of each tom and boost that along with adding attack. Unfortunately we again don’t have two sweepable EQ’s. But usually I cut some lows (except, depending how I feel, the floor tom). The biggest for me is adding attack to the toms kinda like bringing out the click on the kick drum. Getting the attack brings the definition out of the toms and they tend to bounce out the mix. Usually I drop the level just below the mix and pan the toms left and right (only slightly).

Cymbals – We have two overheads which we use for cymbals but I really like bringing in the whole kit into the equation. I use a compressor to Equalize the volume of the whole kit with slight emphasis on the cymbals. Placement of the overheads is key to getting the sound you want. I place them fairly high maybe half a metre above the cymbals in the XY configuration.

  • Clang: 200Hz
  • Sparkle: 8-10kHz

Because the house emphasis the 8kHz range I usually leave the high frequencies (and on occasion cut some). I tend to cut at about 200-400Hz to take the muddiness out of the overheads from the toms and kick etc. and I also cut a little bass this I find just defines the cymbals but doesn’t kill the whole kit and brings ambiance to the sound. I also pan the overheads left and right in conjunction with the toms. the level is somewhere in the middle of the mix. As you can tell I don’t like the clang sound of cymbals.

Bass Guitar – Bass guitar has (and this may surprise some of you) lower fundamental frequency than a kick drum. The bottom is low but sometimes adding too much can leave your sub-woofers fighting for power (as low frequencies require more than high ones) and you might loose your bass definition. This is seldom a problem if you have a good system.

  • Bottom: 50-80Hz
  • Attack: 700Hz (although the fender basses sound better if the attack is boosted at 1kHz)
  • Point: 3-5kHz

So, we tend to add some bottom, maybe 3dB and try add attack by boosting 700Hz by about 3dB. Again do I need to emphasis it more we really need a desk with two sweepable EQ’s for the point/edge in the bass guitar sound. Stereo’ing the bass is like stereo’ing the kick, there is no point. The level I like for the bass guitar is somewhere just below the mix but it depends on the song and if the bass is the driving instrument in the song.

Acoustic Guitar – Ok, this one is going to be tough. All guitar are made equal but some are more equal than others. In other words every guitar sounds different from the next. EQ can be difficult but if you know the fundamentals of an acoustic you can get an idea of what you want to get out of the sound. Remember you can’t boost what isn’t there.

  • Fullness: 80Hz
  • Body: 240Hz
  • Presence: 2-5kHz

I like to cut a bit of the body out (actually cutting more of the honkiness, 400Hz, out. But the body gets affected in the process) of the guitar as this can led to a very muddy mix. But depending on the guitar it can actually sound nice to boost the body. A totally acoustic song for instance can sound great with fullness and body boosted and presence just slightly in there. But for rock, and for it to be distinguishable in the mix of a “rock” sound. Cut at about 400Hz or boost 2-5kHz slightly. and level to taste. I don’t usually boost the lows as I find it fights with the bass guitar and kick for that area of EQ. So, I tend to cut the lows just so that the low end has the bass and kick as the dominant instruments.

Electric Guitar – This in most cases tends to be easy. If you have a “tone freak” for a guitarist (which we have) you can just ask him to set his amp to the sound he likes and you can pretty much EQ to get the same sound with the exception of maybe cutting the mid-lows and lows. I would almost always mike an amplifier than go direct (especially if it is a tube/valve amp). mike it up get and try get the ambiance/natural reverb from the amp. However sometimes you need a little less of something from the electric. So here is a break down of an electrics frequencies.

  • Fullness: 240-500Hz
  • Presence: 1.5-2.5kHz

Basically you want a fuller guitar add some low mids. If you want more presence in the mix add some higher mids. I really like to get a true representation of the amplifier and mix that in for some reason it just fits nicely in the mix. Levels? Depends on if it’s lead or rhythm. Lead just above and rhythm just below the mix. If, like this last week, you have two electrics playing I suggest a bit of panning as it would really define each guitar and make them stand out separately rather than fight for the same area in the mix. Also EQ one for fullness and one for presence can bring about clarity in the mix.

Vocals – Well, vocals falls into a few areas that all have their different EQ’s and levels. Background or lead? female or male? But as a general guideline the frequencies are below:

  • Fullness: 120Hz (Chesty)
  • Boominess: 240Hz
  • Presence/Sibilance: 5kHz
  • Air: 10-15kHz

I tend to cut some and boominess in the guys and slightly in the girls. My main gripe is too much highs and they “ssss” all the time. This is mainly because the system is emphasised towards 8kHz. Which I’ve tried my best to decrease on the house EQ with out it loosing too much. But that aside when there is one male vocalist (which tends to happen a lot) I add fullness to warm up his voice and fill out the mix with vocals. Cut the boominess and add some slight reverb and walla. If I could I’d also boost the 4-5kHz just slightly to bring definition to the voice but you should always look out that the vocals don’t become too harsh if you do this.

Conclusion

Each instrument must have it’s own space whether it be it’s space in the frequency range, volume level, stereo area, or a mixture of the three. Letting each have there place will allow them to stand out and the mix will become clear and definable.

New Page: Setup Guides August 17, 2008

Posted by Phillip Gibb in Uncategorized.
add a comment

We have started the process of putting together guides for setting up various items. Obviously certain tasks have to be shown but that does not take away the benefit of unbundling technical expertise from the organic memory banks to digital ones. Besides this process will empower the volunteers to know more about their jobs and to hopefully take it further by performing their own research.

As I said this will be a process, so over time the guides will improve and will be augmented with photographs and links.

The guides can be accessed via the  set of pages, as in the About Page.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.